Bidding Requirements for Private Works
3.8.2 Bidding Requirements for
Private Works
For private owners, the procedures for submitting, receiving, and opening bids are more informal since they are not subject to the laws governing such procedures for public-works contracts. The manner in which these steps are handled is entirely at the discretion of the owner or engineer. Bid securities are not required. Advertisement for bids is not usually employed. Instead, a Notice to Contractors is issued to a selected group of contractors, known to the owner to be quali?ed.
This notice is accompanied by Instructions to Bidders and a proposal form when competitive bids are required. The Instructions to Bidders generally include the information necessary for preparing and delivering the proposal. Noncollusion af?davits are not required. Tabulation and evaluation of bids and award and execution of contract usually follow the procedure for publicworks contracts, modi?ed to suit the owners
particular needs.
3.8.3 Evaluation and Comparisonof Bids
Following the opening of bids, a public announcement is made of the prices bid for the various items listed in the proposal. These data then are tabulated, the totals for each item veri?ed, and their summation, establishing the total amounts of bids, is checked for each bid submitted. Comparison of the total amounts of the bids establishes the lowest
bid and those that follow in the order of increasing amounts.
3.8.4 Award and Execution of
Contract
Having veri?ed all speci?ed submissions, such as licensing, prequali?cation statements, and noncollusion af?davits, and having established the low bidder, the owner of?cially noti?es the successful bidder of the award of the contract; the bidder is then expected to execute the contract agreement within a speci?ed time. It is a requisite for this ?nal step in the contracting procedure that the successful bidder furnish performance and payment
bonds acceptable to the contracting agency. The amount of these bonds equals the total amount of the bid. The two bonds often are combined into a single performance and payment bond, a guaranty to the owner that all the work required to be performed will be faithfully carried out according to the terms of the contract. Also, it guarantees that
the contractor will pay all lawful claims for payment to subcontractors, material suppliers, and labor for all work done and materials supplied in the performance of the work under the contract.
The bond must also provide that the owner be saved harmless, defended, and indemni?ed
against and fromall suits and costs of any kind and damages to which the owner may be put by reason of injury to the person or property of others resulting from performance of the work or through negligence of the contractor. In addition, the owner must be shielded from all suits and actions that may be brought or instituted by subcontractors, material suppliers, or laborers who have per- formed work or furnished material on the project
and on account of any claims, or amount recovered, by infringement of patents or copyrights. The requirement of the contractor to indemnify and save harmless the owner may be implemented by insurance, by retaining a percentage of the contract
amount until ?nal acceptance of the work, and by the contract bonds. (See also Art. 4.17.)
3.9 Speci?cations Writing:
Style and Form
Preparation of the speci?cations for a construction contract starts with an overall analysis of requirements based on a survey of the proposed work, conditions under which it must be accomplished, materials, details of construction, and owners administrative procedures. The analysis provides the various items for appropriate distribution among the contract documents. Also, a close study of the contract drawings will reveal that which is
insuf?ciently shown and needs to be supplemented in the speci?cations. A descriptive outline of such a distribution or proposed contents with subheadings facilitates and expedites the work of the speci?cations writer when assembling the documents.
Design/build projects are increasingly used to expedite project delivery. This form of project delivery requires additional considerations of risk.
Courts have used the distinction between design speci?cations and performance speci?cations to assign liability for design defects on design/build projects. A descriptive de?nition of these two types of speci?cations follows. Design speci?cations are
those that tightly circumscribe the contractors latitude in choosing products that achieve the speci?ed standard of performance. Whereas performance speci?cations prescribe an objective or standard to be achieved and leave it to the ingenuity of the contractor to select the methods and materials to achieve the speci?ed results.
One example of a design speci?cation is to specify a brand name product without allowance
for possible substitution. Conversely, courts have ruled that specifying a brand-name product with an or equal clause allowing substitution is an example of a technical speci?cation. A contract due date has been determined to be a performance
speci?cation. Courts have decided that a due date is a warranty by the bidding contractor that it can do the work in the speci?ed time and thus is a performance speci?cation.
Design speci?cation should be used when the project owner has strong preferences such as using one brand and type of motor actuated valve for all valves serving a speci?c duty. This allows owners to minimize the need for warehouse space and the use of maintenance staff. However, there is more risk on the part of the writer when design speci?cations are used. Performance speci?cations should be used when the owner is unfamiliar with
a process of mechanism and it wishes to employ the knowledge and expertise of the contractor to accomplish the end goal.
3.9.1 Speci?cations Format
A basic format for speci?cations may be oriented for a particular project and its sponsor. There should be a title page identifying the documents and a table of contents listing the various sections of general provisions and technical speci?cations by section number, title, and page. Cross references in a section should be made by title only.
Otherwise, unnecessary cross checking of references becomes unmanageable. This results from numerous revisions of speci?cations until their release for bidding.
Speci?cations should be organized in divisions and the divisions into sections (Art. 3.7.3). Each technical section usually begins with a brief description of the work included in it.Work contingent upon but not included in the work speci?ed under a particular section may be referenced as Related work speci?ed under other sections. Each section should be complete, with description of materials, workmanship, and requirements for testing clearly
de?ned. All payment items must be mentioned, with methods of measurement and basis of
payment speci?ed for each item.
3.9.2 Precedence of Contract
Documents
Of major importance in coordination and interpretation of contract documents is the establishment of an order of precedence. It is usual to provide that the contract drawings govern over the standard speci?cations and that the special provisions govern over the standard speci?cations and the contract drawings. Thus, in the preparation of
special provisions, care must be exercised to avoid con?ict with the other contract documents and to ensure a de?nite and clear description of the required work. Care must also be taken to avoid duplication of information in the special provisions or in both the drawings and special provisions to preclude con?ict and errors, especially in the event
of changes. It is advisable not to specify both the method to be used and the desired results thereof because a con?ict may relieve the contractor of responsibility.
3.9.3 References to Standard
Speci?cations
When preparing speci?cations for a project for which there are owners standard speci?cations, for example, for a project of a public agency, the speci?cations writer is obliged to incorporate these speci?cations either directly or by reference and to
identify and establish this standard in the special provisions. It is not unusual to cite sections of the standard speci?cations by reference at the beginning of each applicable section of the special provisions, with a paragraph similar to the following:
All work shall be in accordance with Standard Speci?cations (list section number and title), as amended herein.
However, in the text of a section of the special provisions, references may be made to other McGraw-Hill (www.digitalengineeringlibrary.com) sections of the standard speci?cations or to standards other than the owners, in whole or in part.
Special provisions therefore modify, restrict, or add to the standard speci?cations, where necessary, and admit such options and alternatives as may be permitted. Do not repeat portions of the standard speci?cations in the special provisions, and avoid repeated references in special provisions to a standard speci?cations section. Redundancy
leads to error!
3.9.4 Basic Principles of Good
Speci?cation Writing
Speci?cations usually are written in the traditional style of composition, grammatically correct. They should go into asmuch qualitative and quantitative detail as necessary, to convey thatwhich is required and therefore agreed to. Chances for misunder-
standings and disputes, which frequently result in expensive litigation, should be kept to a minimum.
Ambiguity and verbosity should be avoided. A good speci?cation is clear, concise, complete and easily understood. It gives little cause for doubt of the intentions of the parties concerned and leaves nothing to be taken for granted. The courts have
traditionally interpreted ambiguous requirements against the party who prepared them.
Inasmuch as the speci?cations, in conjunction with the drawings, are the means employed to guide the contractor in producing the desired end product, it is essential that they be correlated to avoid con?icts and misunderstandings of the requirements. Instructions more readily described in words belong in the technical speci?cations, whereas information that can be more effectively portrayed graphically should appear on the drawings. Information on the drawings should not beduplicated in the speci?cations or vice versa because
there may be a discrepancy between the information provided in the two documents that may cause trouble.
Since speci?cations complement the drawings, the special provisions and standard speci?cations together should leave no doubt as to the quality and quantity of the required work. The function of the drawings is to show location, dimensions, scope, con?guration, and detail of the required work. The function of the speci?cations is to de?ne
the minimum requirements of quality of material and workmanship, prescribe tests by which these must be established, and describe methods of measurement and payment.
The contract documents should be fair to owner, bidders, contractor, engineer/architect, and others concerned. Any aspect of the work not clearly de?ned in the speci?cations or on the drawings will result in time and effortwasted during bidding or during construction, higher contract prices including, contingencies, and in all probability arguments over extras, with ensuing delays.
Following are some general suggestions for writing speci?cations: Be speci?c, not inde?nite. Be brief; avoid unnecessary words or phrases. Give all facts necessary. Avoid repetition. Specify in the positive form. Use correct grammar. Direct rather than suggest. Use short rather than long sentences.
Do not specify both methods and results. Do not specify requirements in con?ict with each other. Do not justify a requirement. Avoid sentences that require other than the simplest punctuation. Also, avoid words that are likely to be unfamiliar to users of the speci?cations, especially if the words have more than one meaning.
Be particularly careful when requiring approval by the engineer. Speci?c approval by the engineer of the contractors equipment, methods, temporary construction, or safety standards, in certain situations, can relieve the construction contractor of responsibility under the terms of the contract. It is best, and usually the general provisions of speci?ca-
tions require, that the contractor be responsible for means, methods, and scheduling of construction.
When preparing the Construction Details of a speci?cation, arrange the material in the sequence in which the work will be done. For example, specify the curing of concrete after specifying formwork, concrete mixing, and concrete placing.
When inserting a reference to a national standard, such as a standard ASTM speci?cation, read the standard ?rst to assure yourself that it contains nothing that con?icts with job requirements.
The measurement and payment portion of a speci?cation is most important to both the contractor and owner. Every item of work to be done by the contractor must be accounted for, whether it be measured and paid for separately or included for payment in another item.
Refer only to the principals to the contract: the owner, as represented by the engineer, or the contractor. Do not refer to other contractors, subcontractors, bidders, etc.
Refer to these speci?cations rather than this speci?cation; use the plural.
Workmanship should be in accordance with, and materials should conform to, a reference
speci?cation.
Use the phrase at no additional cost to the owner only when there is a de?nite possibility of the contractors not understanding that he or she is to bear a certain expense. Liberal use of the phrase might imply that other work speci?ed is not at the contractors expense.
Use theword shall for requirements placed on the contractor and the word will for expressions of intent on the part of the owner.
Do not confuse the meaning of words; proper word usage is of utmost importance.
Do not use inde?nite words when more exact words may be substituted.
Avoid repeated use of stock phrases and stereotyped expressions. Speci?cations should not be encumbered with legal phrases that obscure their meaning or subordinate their function to that of a legal document.
Streamlined Speci?cations
An alternative to the traditional style of speci?cations is a streamlined form. This is accomplished by shortening sentence structure wherever practicable.
Properly employed, streamlining may be a major improvement. In general, streamlining omits from the speci?cations, without a change in meaning, those words having no legal signi?cance. Only necessary provisions are retained. A good long-form speci?cation can be streamlined without the slightest adulteration and yet reduce its bulk by one-third or more.
The technique of streamlining speci?cations may be adopted as a simpli?cation of style, productive of a distinctive form of writing speci?cations, whereas the general format remains the same.
However, note that this style is more readily adap-table to building construction contracts, wherein each section of the technical speci?cations relates directly to a particular construction trade.
Some aspects and considerations in streamlining speci?cations advocated by Ben John Small (The Case for Streamlined Speci?cations, The Construction Speci?er, July 1949) are:
The term streamlining should not be interpreted to mean that it refers to a speci?cation lacking thoroughness or that streamlining is synonymous with speci?cations devoid of the three Cs (ClarityConciseness-Comprehensiveness). Any speci?cation long or short must be equipped with the requisite Cs if it is to associate properly with its other relatives, which
constitute the family of Contract Documents, such as theAgreement,GeneralConditions, theDrawings, etc.
Streamlining offers no cure for ineptitude inwriting speci?cations, such as con?icting repetitions, giving contradictory instructions, etc. What it does, af?rmatively, is to translate the writers knowledge of construction and materials into simple, readable expressions subject to less misinterpretation. The most important part of streamlining is a statement that not only explains the use of the streamlined speci?cation format but states only once in the entire speci?cations the requisite mandatory provisions that are usually repeated ad nauseam in traditional speci?cations. By requisite mandatory provisions we mean expressions such as The Contractor shall…, The Contractor must…, The Contractor may… . These expressions tell the contractor to do something in different ways, which in a dispute could bring as many interpretations. The explanatory statement of streamlined speci?cations should be included as an article in the General Conditions, such as:
ART. 64SPECIFICATIONS EXPLANATION
(a) The Speci?cations are of the abbreviated, simpli?ed or streamlined type and include incomplete sentences. Omissions of words or phrases, such as The Contractor shall, in conformity there- with, shall be, as noted on the Drawings, according to the plans, a, an, the, and all are intentional. Omitted words or phrases shall be supplied by inference in the same manner as they are when a note occurs on the Drawings.
(b) The Contractor shall provide all items, articles, materials, operations, or methods listed, mentioned, or scheduled either on theDrawings or speci?ed herein, or both, including all labor, materials, equipment, and incidentalsnecessary and required for their completion.
(c)Whenever the words approved, satisfactory, directed, submitted, inspected, or similarwords or phrases are used, it shall be assumed that the words Engineer or his or her representative follow the verb as the object of the clause, such as approved by the
Engineer or his or her representative.
(d) All references to standard speci?cations or manufacturers installation directions shall mean the latest edition at the time of advertisement, unless speci?cally noted otherwise.
References. Standard Speci?cations for Highway Bridges, and Guide Speci?cations for
Highway Construction, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Of?cials, 444 N. Capitol St., N.W., Washington, DC 20001.
www.transportation.org
Manual of Practice, including such documents as CSI MASTERFORMAT, Section Format, Construction Documents and the Project Manual, Bidding Requirements, Methods of Specifying, Performance Speci?cations, Speci?cation Language, and Speci?cation Writing and Production, Construction Speci?cations Institute, 99 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 300 Alexandria, VA 22314.
www.csinet.org
Federal Highway Administration, Standard
Speci?cations for Construction of Roads and
Bridges on Federal Highway Projects, FP-92, U.S.
Government Printing Of?ce, Washington, DC
20402. www.gpo.gov
J. Goldbloom, Engineering Construction Speci?cations, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
3.10 Word Processing of
Speci?cations
Use of personal computers and word-processing software simpli?es, speeds, and lowers cost of speci?cation writing. The information is stored in a manner that enables it to be easily modi?ed and reproduced accurately and ef?ciently.
A word processor produces normal ?nished pages (hard copy) of text and concurrently stores the text as ?les on the computers hard disk, central server, diskettes, tape, CDs, etc. Diskettes and CDs allow easy transport and sharing of master speci?cations documents. Diskettes and CDs can be reused many times, but the stored document
?les should be restored every other year or so to ensure integrity of the stored speci?cation. Document ?les stored on hard drives, diskettes, and CDs
can be retrieved and printed to provide hard copies of the speci?cations in their latest version.
A ?rst step in establishing a system is preparation of master speci?cations for storage
(Art. 3.5). The stored master speci?cations are used by speci?cations writers as a basis for preparing hard copies of project speci?cations. Using word processing software, a speci?cation writer edits the master and deletes inapplicable sections.
To facilitate editing, much current word-processing software contains editing assistance
called strikeout and underline. The word processor edits the standard speci?cation document per the speci?cation writers editing markups. Then, using the word-processing software, the writer compares the edited version with the standard speci?cation.
Any deleted information is designated by a strikeout: for example, strikeout. Any added information is designated by underline: for example, underline. These features allow the writer to review quickly only those portions that have been modi?ed. Once the editing is completed, the writer can simply eliminate the underlines and the strikeout text to provide a ?nished speci?cation.
A primary task of the speci?cations writer when using a speci?cations system is to constantly up- grade and update themaster speci?cations. The use of the Internet, makes continuous improvement of the quality of speci?cations a relatively easy task
for the speci?cations writer.
Master speci?cations are becoming increasingly available from speci?cations authoring entities via the Internet. Some sites with master speci?cations available by subscription are located at: www.
csinet.org, www.4specs.com, and www.spectext.
com.
By : E-book Standard Handbook for Civil Engineers











































